(Environmental Accounting)Yamaha Group

  Yamaha Corporation introduced environmental accounting in fiscal 1999 as a means of quantitatively evaluating the effectiveness of its environmental conservation activities. These environmental accounting practices were then implemented at Yamaha Group manufacturing companies and resort facilities in Japan, and since fiscal 2004 they have also been implemented at some overseas Group production sites.

Yamaha Group (Yamaha Corporation and Group Production Companies in Japan)

Environmental Expenses

  The Yamaha Group's environmental equipment investment in fiscal 2012 decreased by ¥15 million to ¥150 million.

  Principal investments were for effluent treatment facilities upgrades and other utility refinement.

Environmental Expenses (million yen)
  Details Investment*1 Expenses*2
Business area costs Pollution prevention Prevention of air, water and soil pollution, etc. 101.4 239.9
Energy conservation, etc. Prevention of global warming, protection of the ozone layer, etc. 40.2 70.5
Waste, etc. Waste recycling, resource saving, conservation of water, etc. 5.0 334.2
Upstream/downstream costs Recycling of products, improvements in logistics, etc. 0.7 64.0
Management costs Environmental education, ISO 14001, greening of premises, etc. 2.2 331.6
Research and development costs Development of environmentally friendly products, prototypes, etc. - 128.2
Social activity costs Social contributions, etc 0.0 20.2
Environmental damage costs Groundwater purification, SOx levies, etc. 0.3 12.4
Total 149.7
( ) Indicates comparison with the previous year
  • *1  Equipment investment refers to investment in factories and equipment made for environmental conservation objectives. The figure is calculated by multiplying the purchase price of individual pieces of equipment by a figure determined by the proportion of the environmental conservation purpose to the whole purpose of the purchase of such equipment (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1.0).
  • *2 Expenses refer to personnel and other costs expended for environmental conservation activities. Personnel expenses are calculated by multiplying the time spent on environmental conservation activities determined by the manager of each department by a common unit cost of personnel expenses set in each company. Costs are determined by multiplying the amounts paid externally by a certain figure calculated using a proportional distribution method as in the case of investment amounts (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1.0). Depreciation costs are not included.

Environmental Investment

Environmental Investment

Environmental Expenses

Environmental Expenses

Environmental Effects

1. Environmental Conservation Effects

  The Yamaha Group's CO2 emissions fell by 1,600 tons compared with the previous fiscal year to 61,100 tons.

  Water usage increased by 20,000 m3 year on year to 1,340,000 m3.

  As a result of the Yamaha Group's efforts to achieve the target of Zero Emissions through reuse of resources and other measures, final disposal at landfills was 13.5 tons, up by 8.7 tons from the previous fiscal year. Emissions of chemical substances decreased by 11 tons to 45 tons.

Environmental Conservation Effects
Details Unit FY2011 FY2012 Change
CO2 emissions 10,000tons-CO2 6.27 6.11 0.16
Greenhouse gas emissions 10,000tons-CO2 0.69 0.74 -0.05
Water consumption 10,000m3 132 134 -2
Waste treated or disposed of tons 4.8 13.5 -8.7
Chemical substances released*3 tons 56 45 11
CFC substitutes emissions tons 0.0 0.0 0.0
  • *3 “Chemical substances” refers to those substances subject to the PRTR Law that the Yamaha Group in Japan uses.

2. Economic Effects

  Electricity and heating costs increased by roughly ¥92 million to ¥2,330 million compared with the previous fiscal year. Water costs remained ¥18 million as unchanged from the previous year, and sewerage costs decreased by ¥2 million to ¥30 million. Waste treatment costs decreased by approximately ¥20 million to ¥147 million.

  As a result of the conversion of waste to valuable materials, the Group gained ¥255 million in income from the sale of valuable materials, resulting in a total economic effect of ¥185 million.

  All figures presented are actual figures from the accounting register, and include no estimates.

Economic Effects (million yen)
Details FY2011 FY2012 Savings
Total savings     -71
Electricity and heating costs 2,211 2,303 -92
Water costs 18 18 0
Sewerage costs 32 30 2
Waste disposal costs 167 147 20
Income from sales of valuable wastes 167 255 255
Economic effects     185
  1.  Environmental Performance Data, Environmental Accounting (2): Resort Facilities
  2.  Environmental Performance Data, Environmental Accounting (3): Group Manufacturing Companies Located Overseas

Return to Top

Third-Party Opinion

We obtained an opinion from a specialist to assist in improving the CSR Report.

Editorial Policy

Editorial policy for the CSR report.